Jackery 100 Plus vs Jackery 3000 Pro

Power Unleashed: A Head-to-Head Comparison of the Jackery Explorer 500 vs. Explorer 300

We’re Reader-Supported. We Get Commissions for Purchases Made Through Links in this Article.

When the open road calls or unforeseen power outages strike, having a reliable portable power station can make all the difference. Jackery, a known leader in the portable power station space, offers a range of products to keep your devices charged and ready. In this article, we’ll dissect the features of two popular models: the Jackery Explorer 500 and the Jackery Explorer 300. Our aim is to help you decide which power station suits your adventure and backup power needs.

Detailed Technical Specifications

Before we delve deeper into each product, let’s lay out the technical specifications side by side for a snapshot comparison.

FeatureJackery Explorer 500Jackery Explorer 300
Battery Capacity518Wh293Wh
Inverter Rating500W continuous, 1000W surge peak300W continuous, 500W surge peak
AC Output110V, 60Hz, Pure Sine Wave110V, 60Hz, Pure Sine Wave
DC OutputRegulated 12VRegulated 12V
Car OutletYesYes
USB PortsThree USB-A PortsOne PD USB-C Port, One Quick Charge 3.0, One USB-A Port
Cycle Life800 cycles to 80% capacity800 cycles to 80% capacity
Recharging Time via Wall OutletApprox. 7.5 hoursApprox. 4.5 hours
Solar Charging OptionYes – 9.5 hours to fullYes – 3.5 hours to 80% (approx. 5 hours to full)
Weight13.3lbs (6kg)7.1lbs (3.2kg)
Dimensions (LxWxH)11.8 x 7.6 x 9.5 inches9.1 x 5.2 x 7.8 inches

Power and Performance

The Jackery Explorer 500 leads the charge with a substantial 518Wh battery capacity, making it well-suited for longer usage and powering larger devices such as mini-fridges or TVs. On the other hand, the smaller Jackery Explorer 300’s 293Wh battery is suitable for charging laptops, drones, and small appliances while being more lightweight and portable.

Charging and Ports

Diving into the world of ports, the Explorer 500 offers two DC ports, one car charging port, and three USB-A ports, while the Explorer 300 sports a more modern approach with a PD USB-C port alongside a Quick Charge 3.0 and a regular USB-A port. These differences highlight the Explorer 300’s focus on charging gadgets swiftly, which modern users may find more convenient.

Flexibility in Recharging

Both units can be recharged via solar panels, wall outlets, or car outlets. The Jackery Explorer 500 will need around 9.5 hours to charge fully via solar panels, while the Explorer 300 caters to a faster-paced lifestyle, charging 80% in just 3.5 hours under optimal sunlight.

Portability and Design

The Explorer 300 wins in terms of portability, weighing in at a travel-friendly 7.1 lbs and sporting a more compact design. The Explorer 500, meanwhile, is heftier at 13.3 lbs but compensates with a higher output for more substantial power needs.

Safety and Protection

Both models feature an Intelligent Battery Management System to protect against overcurrent and overvoltage. With pure sine wave inverters, they ensure that your sensitive devices are safely powered, making either a reliable choice for various electronic needs.

The Verdict

Choosing between the Jackery Explorer 500 and Explorer 300 boils down to your specific power needs and desire for portability. The Explorer 500 shines in providing prolonged power, while the Explorer 300 offers swift charging in a lighter package. Consider the devices you’ll be powering, how you plan to recharge the station, and how much portability matters to you. Regardless of your choice, you’re sure to get a durable, reliable, and safe power backup that you can take anywhere.

Jackery
Jackery Portable Power Station Explorer 500, 518Wh Outdoor Solar Generator Mobile Lithium Battery Pack with 110V/500W AC Outlet for Home Use, Emergency Backup,Road Trip Camping (Solar Panel Optional)
Jackery
Jackery Portable Power Station Explorer 300, 293Wh Backup Lithium Battery, 110V/300W Pure Sine Wave AC Outlet, Solar Generator for Outdoors Camping Travel Hunting Blackout (Solar Panel Optional)

Comments

Leave a Reply