Jackery 290 vs Jackery 240

Jackery 290 vs EcoFlow Delta 2: A Detailed Technical Showdown

We’re Reader-Supported. We Get Commissions for Purchases Made Through Links in this Article.

Looking to power up your adventures or ensure you have an emergency backup that won’t let you down? Two of the most talked-about portable power stations on the market are the Jackery 290 and the EcoFlow Delta 2. In this comprehensive comparison, we dive deep into the specs, features, and capabilities to help you decide which one might be the powerhouse you need.

Battery Capacity and Lifespan

One of the most critical aspects of a portable power station is its battery capacity. The Jackery 290 comes with a 290Wh lithium-ion battery rated for 1000 cycles to 80% capacity, meaning it should retain good performance for a fair amount of time. On the other hand, the EcoFlow Delta 2 boasts a larger 1024Wh capacity, which is also expandable. Its battery life is substantial, and the unit comes with a 5-year warranty for peace of mind.

Charging Options and Times

Both power stations offer multiple charging methods including solar, wall, and car charging. The Jackery 290 has a slight edge with its built-in MPPT controller that boosts solar charging efficiency by up to 23%, but it charges slightly slower, taking about 5 hours with a solar panel and up to 6.5 hours via a car charger. The EcoFlow Delta 2 shines with its X-Stream Fast Charging, reaching 80% in just 50 minutes when using an AC outlet. Solar charging is super efficient, too, with the ability to charge in 3-6 hours using the right setup.

Output Options

Powering your devices is where these stations show their differences. The Jackery 290 has one AC outlet, a DC car port, and two USB-A ports. In contrast, the Delta 2 packs six AC outlets and multiple USB ports including fast charge and high-power USB-C ports, clearly taking the lead in terms of connectivity and power distribution.

Dimensions and Portability

Portability is key for many users, and both units have their perks. The Jackery 290 is lighter at 7.5 lbs and smaller, making it incredibly easy to carry around on trips. The EcoFlow Delta 2 is bulkier at 27 lbs but still manageable, catering to users needing more power on the go.

Safety and Environmental Considerations

Safety is an aspect neither brand compromises on. Both models have battery management systems that ensure safe operation, with Jackery offering additional controls through its smart display. Both are also eco-friendly choices, operating without emissions.

The Verdict

When it comes down to choosing between the Jackery 290 and the EcoFlow Delta 2, it truly depends on your power needs. The Jackery 290 stands out for its portability and efficient solar charging, suitable for casual adventurers who prioritize lightness and moderate power. However, if you need more power, expanded portability, and faster charging times, the EcoFlow Delta 2 is the powerhouse you’re likely looking for.

FeatureJackery 290EcoFlow Delta 2
Battery Capacity290Wh1024Wh (expandable)
Lifecycle1000 cycles to 80%5-Year Warranty
AC Output200W Max (400W surge)1800W Total (2700W surge)
Solar Charging TimeApprox. 5 hours3-6 hours
Wall Charging TimeApprox. 5.5 hours0-80% in 50 minutes
Ports1 AC, 1 DC, 2 USB-A6 AC, 4 USB-A, 2 USB-C
Dimensions9.1 X 5.2 X 7.7 in15.7 x 8.3 x 11 in
Weight7.5 lbs27 lbs
Jackery
Jackery Portable Power Station Explorer 290, 290Wh Backup Lithium Battery, 110V/200W Pure Sine Wave AC Outlet, Solar Generator (Solar Panel Not Included) for Outdoors Camping Travel(Renewed)
EcoFlow
EF ECOFLOW Portable Power Station DELTA 2, 1024Wh LiFePO4 (LFP) Battery, Fast Charging, Solar Generator(Solar Panel Optional) for Home Backup Power, Camping & RVs

Whether you’re ensuring your family stays powered during an outage, or you’re fueling your devices on a mountaintop, both the Jackery 290 and the EcoFlow Delta 2 have much to offer. Consider your energy consumption, portability requirements, and how each power station fits into your lifestyle before making your final decision.


Comments

Leave a Reply